When multiple users try to save the same case, what does the Allow multiple users case-locking strategy provide?

The Allow multiple users case-locking strategy provides users the option of determining which version of the case to save. This means that if multiple users are working on the same case simultaneously, they are not blocked from attempting to save their individual changes. Instead, when they try to save, they are presented with the available versions of the case, allowing them to choose which one they would like to commit. This strategy is useful in collaborative environments where several users may need to make contributions to the same case without the need for sequential saving, thus helping to facilitate a more fluid workflow while ensuring that important updates are not lost.

The other options don't accurately reflect the behavior enabled by this strategy. For instance, prompting all users to save changes would not provide any flexibility in managing concurrent edits. Allowing only the first user to save would hinder collaboration by proving exclusive access to a single user. Locking the case for all other users would eliminate the ability for concurrent updates entirely, which goes against the premise of the Allow multiple users case-locking strategy.