Which type of configuration is most beneficial for user roles and permissions in a Pega application?

Implementing group-based access controls system-wide is the most beneficial configuration for managing user roles and permissions in a Pega application. This approach allows organizations to create structured and scalable permission management by grouping users according to their roles, responsibilities, or functions within the application.

When user roles are defined at a group level, it simplifies the process of maintaining and updating access controls, particularly as the organization grows or as roles evolve. Instead of having to manage permissions for each individual user, which can become unmanageable with larger teams or changing job functions, group-based access allows for consistency and easier management since you can modify permissions for the entire group in one action.

This configuration also enhances security and compliance, as it ensures that users can only access the resources and functionalities that are appropriate for their roles. It supports the principle of least privilege, reducing the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive information based on user role assignments.

In contrast, defining roles on an individual case level can create inconsistencies and increase maintenance overhead. Assigning permissions based on individual user sessions complicates the access management process and may lead to potential security risks if not carefully monitored. Utilizing default roles for all users lacks the granularity needed to effectively manage varying levels of responsibility, which can lead to either overly restrictive